Find a Lawyer

MRS. AFSARA ASIF ALI RASHID versus BOARD OF TRUSTEES

Sections 2 (a) (f), 3, 11, 13, 14 and 15 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Appeal Transfer of Abandoned Property Specific Person, Applicant's Complaint was that he applied the property in question. Was purchased. Owner through his lawyer, but through a notification issued under section 11 of the Abandoned Properties (Management) Act 1975, the property owner / seller was declared a specific person and property was a misleading property applicant. Had prayed for it to be announced. The property in question is instructed as the property owner and the respondents should not interfere with their rights in relation to the property. The Vedetta Petitioner claimed that he had purchased the property from the shopkeeper / owner in 1981. However, while acknowledging the fact that the alleged seller was an East Pakistani who emigrated from Pakistan after the formation of Bangladesh, 12 12 1971, the alleged seller has clearly come in appreciation of specific person and property. ? This difference came under the definition of `abandoned property ', which was charged by the federal government, with the sale allegedly taking place after the declaration of the Abandoned Properties (Management) Act 1973. And the applicant failed to present a lawyer for the said person. In affirming the matter, the transaction authority correctly concluded that the alleged sale of the applicant in the favor of the applicant was not understandable and that the alleged vendor in good faith Accommodation on the East Pakistan quota was allotted and if after the establishment of Bangladesh, it would have been in Pakistan since 18 11 1973. us immigration advocates from Kamalia Musa lawyer