Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ZAFAR versus JUDGE, FAMILY COURT

Article 10 (4), the provisions [as incorporated by the Family Courts (Amendment) Ordinance (LV of 2002]] did not claim to dissolve marriage in the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 constitutional petition. Neither went nor prayed in a written statement nor failed the reconciliation efforts during the trial, approval of the decree to dissolve the marriage without ordering the wife to return the door to the husband, in the constitutional jurisdiction Accuracy The High Court will examine whether or not it has been approved in conformity with the law and the facts of the case as requested. It has been claimed that such a request must be made before the trial court, so that the other party should have the opportunity to meet him and the court should be given the opportunity to address the Dwyer given to the bride husband. Appointment and Determination - Diver could not claim to approach the High Court for restitution as he was deprived of all favorable and appropriate conditions, events and opportunities. In this case, the High Court rejected the constitutional application. when you need a advocate from Jalal Pur Jatan lawyer