GHULAM ABBAS versus STATE
Section 2 302 (b) / evidence 34 The evidence was appreciated during the last incident of the night The accused were not nominated in the FIR The identity parade was not held in this case to positively affect the accused. The presence of the complainant and other witnesses at the scene was very suspicious, the changed case of the trial by witnesses did not encourage the trust which came only at a later stage. He justified the accused's alleged motives Extra-judicial confession was unbelievable by chance, during interrogation of the accused Both have been licensed gun was undisputed, was not accused of any FIR against the accused in the alleged goal was not delayed construction and the accused was acquitted in the case.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Kohat lawyer
