Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD IDREES versus STATE


Sections 497 (2) of the Customs Act (IV of 1969), Sections 2 (s), 16, 156 (1) (89), 157 (2) and 178 of the Import and Export (Control) Act (XXXX of 1950), Section 3 ()) The bail, further investigation, involved the driver's vehicle driving the vehicle directly into the property owned by the firm's employees, by a firm for transporting clothing, which was also accompanied by the employee with the vehicle. At the time of the occupation, the clothing was owned by the firm that was legally purchased. It was admitted that the Syed employee had prepared the documents to satisfy the customs authorities. It was alleged that he held only luggage. Otherwise, an FIR could result in a maximum sentence of up to 6 years in prison if it is not found. The prohibition clause of section 497 (1), the CRPC suspects' case was subject to further investigation and the accused was no longer required for further investigation by the customs authorities; the accused was admitted in bail.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
solicitors from Sikandarabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.