Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD KHAN versus STATE

Kalashnikov and other unlawful weapons on the arrest of applicant accused of suspension of sections 426, 103 and 156 (2) of the Illegal Arms Act (XXI of 1991), Sections 7 (b) and 7 (c) The presence was disclosed to his home and he himself recovered a weapon and he failed to present a valid license for possessing illegal weapons. The crime against the accused was illegal by the Illegal Arms Act, 1991. The report cited by the Franz Science Laboratory regarding the weapon was on record was not in the record, which may have led to the complaint that either complaint The witness or other witness of the prosecution, who was a police officer, was outraging the accused or involved him for serious reasons, in the absence of any unidentified evidence on record. The police officers, inadvertently, said that the statements of the police officers were credible and were properly believed by the trial court by the provision of section 103, not the CCP lawyer, in the present case the accused was charged. , As locals fear reluctance to attach themselves to the recovery process because Spelling complaint was a police officer, and was not eligible to become the investigating officer. As there is no restriction of the provisions of section 156 (2) in this regard, the CRPC expressly provided that in any case, the action of a police officer would not be questioned on the basis that this case He was the one who had no such officer. Under this section, the competent applicant / accused under this section to investigate the case list of advocates from Issa Khel lawyer