ABDUL MAJEED versus STATE
Section 6161A A Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 337D Sessions Court Implementation of Throne Impact and Lack of Payment, PPC, which was to be imposed on the accused in the trial court, when sentenced, It had no discretion either to suspend the imposition of the Throne or to direct payment of less than 1 / 3rd of the yat dit of, however, in the case of the adoption of the imprisonment under section 777D, p. The PC had the discretion to imprison or not approve it or to impose a sentence of up to ten years. The court was not challenged if the accused was found guilty. There is no discretion to reduce or impose the amount of the \ 'Arch of, the decision passed by the Sessions Court was not open to any exception under Section 561A, accordingly to the CRPC. Dismissed \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Pishin lawyer
