MUHAMMAD AMIN ALIAS NAEEM versus STATE
Definition of section 2302 (b) evidence was not proved by the prosecution. Eyewitnesses described the injuries to the accused person, indicating that he was not present on the spot and did not. Had seen And since the proximity to the deceased, which contradicted each other on material points, the FIR was not confirmed by any independent evidence, medical evidence was not consistent with the presence of evidence. The defense version confirmed that the victim, at the time of the murder, was involved in the commission of the sodomy with the accused, who, on the occasion, recovered the theft, and the victim was injured and supported such a request. He accused himself of the evidence of the defense prosecution, so he himself thought and helped convince the defense story that the accused was acquitted of the situation.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Blitang lawyer
