Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ARIF versus STATE

Section 5 365A / evidence evidence The delay in filing the FIR, which was interpreted as evidence, was of no avail and the defense did not receive any benefit because the court had alleged abduction. There was no result of non-production as it was just. 1 // old years old and it was not possible to make a statement before the police or before the trial court, statements of two material witnesses who were not given any evidence of hostility from the accused, the confident defendant filed his case. Was proved. The trial court upheld his conviction and sentence and his appeal was dismissed. immigration advocates phone number from Landi Kotal lawyer