SHAHBAZ versus STATE
The delay of four months in filing Section 497 (2) Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 395 and 412 bail, cannot be justified as to how the complainant knew about being one of the accused. Although the cash of Huwa 500 was recovered from the accused after his arrest, it cannot be stated with judicial certainty that it was said that the cash was seized by the accused during the incident as the accused after being snatched. Had said that the cash would be kept in his custody so that he could remain in his custody. He was presented before the police after the facts mentioned in the FIR had made the accused a suspect in his own involvement. In the case of further investigation, the accused was admitted on bail.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Sibi lawyer
