CHIC TEXTILE MILLS (PVT.) LIMITTED THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE versus ALLIED BANK LIMITED
Section 9 and 22 dismissed suit for recovery of suit, suit was dismissed for non-prosecution, the plaintiff filed a petition for reinstatement, but said the request was rejected and the plaintiff dismissed the order. The suit was filed on the day the claim was not dismissed, the suit could not be dismissed because the possibility of noting the wrong date as claimed by the claimant could not be denied. Is. It should have done some investigation and at least the plaintiff or the plaintiff's lawyer's clerk, who was told about the date, should have examined the deficiency even though the suit by the plaintiff, restored the suit with costs. Turned out, the suit will be considered pending trial. When it was rejected
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Jehangira lawyer
