MUHAMMAD IMRAN versus MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE
Sections 6 516A and 1 561 were presented before the court in connection with the actual transfer of the accuracy of a supermarket vehicle showing a genuine document demonstrating the transfer of the vehicle in favor of the respondent, while applying it to the applicant. Moved to name. Because of the forged documents, Seid Vehicle, for the same reason, the lower court correctly granted the defendant's right to Superdy, the order following Supreddy's facing any misrepresentation or misreading on record or by any jurisdictional error. Didn't have to Do not demand any interference by the High Court Petition and accordingly was dismissed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Hujra Shah Muqeem lawyer
