Find a Lawyer

MRS. FARKHUNDA JABEEN versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Sections 3B and 10 CBR Letter No. 2 (62) STP / 97 (PT2), dated 17 4, 1999, section 2 of the Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XNXXV 2000). 3) excess tax collection etc. was claimed. Based on a letter from the Department of Bank, auctioned incorrectly as a sales tax on auctioned / used vehicles, 15% due to the account collected by the agency collecting tax collection and collection by the collecting agency. Refused to submit the treasury. The Sales Tax Act of 1990 was non-refundable and the Central Board of Revenue had already made it clear that input, tax credit / adjustment was available only when the bidders / buyers were registered with the Sales Tax Department. It was proved by the complainant's claim in response to the refund request filed on 28 7 2003 and the reply of the defective delay on 29 4 2004 and proper recommendation is being made according to the recommendation before the time of issue of return. It was found that the Federation Tax Ombudsman recommended that the Collector consult the officer responsible for the negligence and complain. Delay in responding to the claims filed by the manufacturer and the collector institute investigated the premise and justification of the letter. Bank \ r \ n \ r \ n online advocate from Chunian lawyer