SHEHZAD MUJAHID versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE,
Section 17/24 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 133 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the Constitution Petition states that the seal has been ordered by the magistrate who is resident in the area. Cause for concern. Since the Magistrate was not a party to the proceedings, he was not a provocative person and was not entitled to a constitutional petition filed by him that required the Magistrate to receive the complaint and pass an unclean order after the implementation of the Pakistan Environment Protection Ordinance 1997. There was no jurisdiction. , Under which, under Sections 17 and 24, only the Senior Civil Judge, the Judicial Magistrate, was notified as Environmental Magistrate. The ordinance directing the Judicial Magistrate to seal the property was and is illegal. Was due. Coram Nan Judis was terminated, which resulted in the sessions court ruling on the use of his analysis, and the jurisdiction was also based on an illegal injunction. However, the High Court cannot sit as a useless spectator on the situation created by the applicant, which caused mental and physical distress, anxiety and distress due to the surrounding anxiety. Such a move by a shoe manufacturer in the residential area cannot be approved by the applicant or his father's motion to dismiss the defendant's complaint on the pretext of jurisdiction filed by the defendant through the Judicial Magistrate Complaint. , Shall be considered pending with the Senior Civil Judge, the Judicial Magistrate, who shall make a similar decision on the merits within a stipulated period following the hearing of the two parties. \ R \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Shakargarh lawyer