Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus STATE

In view of the value of section 9 (c) criminal code of conduct (v. 1898), section 103 evidence was granted to the Assistant Sub Inspector Police in the search and arrest of the accused without a search warrant. The policemen were not good witnesses like any other witness, no arrests were made by any section I and no serious prejudice was faced with the accused, no misunderstanding of justice was encountered. In this case, it was because the provisions of Section 21 of the Narcotic Material Act 1997 were directory and not mandatory in nature; a large quantity of 13 kilograms ras recovered recovered from the accused Chemical Examiner, no evil or There was no enmity. Accused and evidence was presented against the accused by the accused, evidence of the prosecution was consistent in the necessary details Minor contradictions were not fatal to the prosecution's case not to face any legal or factual weakness. The conviction and the sentence of the accused was maintained in the circumstances \ r \ n \ r \ n famous high court advocate from Kakul lawyer