Find a Lawyer

NAJMA SHAHZADI ALIAS RANI BIBI versus STATE

Section 497 Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Sections 10, 12, 13, 14 and 18 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 292 and 377 Convention Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 71 Bail In the Grant FIR, it was merely stated that the complainant had seen a film depicting pornography on the accused along with two co-accused. The film maker or the employee hired for that purpose was not disclosed or mentioned in the FIR, what would be said about recording his statements, enforcement of adultery (enforcement) Hood) establishes Section 10 under the Ordinance 1979, witnesses have to witness the actual commission of witnessing adultery by filming the VCR, etc., they did not require the quality of evidence under the law evidence. In 1984, the FIR did not show that anyone had sold the film or was hired by anyone under Section 10 of the Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance, 1979. The allegations against the accused in the FIR, however, cannot be taken seriously unless their support, affirmation and scrutiny is denied to the citizen on such grounds or allegations. Can be as alleged in the FIR that she is a woman and she was also told about the breastfeeding baby's mother and Section 497, CR PC. Or is A gentle gesture of self-guarantee by women famous high court advocate from Pir Mahal lawyer