Find a Lawyer

DHANIDINO versus STATE

In section 302 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), the definition of section 231 evidence indicated that the accused had allegedly killed two people, but the trial court charged and cited the murder of only one trial court. Was charged with modification, but under Section 231, CR, the defendants were not provided with any opportunity to retract the witness. The PC, which caused the accused to be prejudiced because the first indictment had to defend itself against the murder of only one person, while the amended indictment allowed it to murder two persons. Had to defend itself in which another disorder was committed. The conclusion of the proceedings when the accused's statements were column, name, father's name, religion, caste, age, and age was recorded and the residence was blank with a thumbprint at the end of the statement, but it was not written which The impression of the thumb was taken and the Additional Advocate General and Assistant Advocate General did not deny the facts and the decision was wrong. With their consent, a case has been referred to the trial court, which has been directed to provide the accused with Section 231, CRPC, and if the accused is to return the three witnesses named in the first verdict. If requested, these witnesses will be recalled and more will be added. The cross-examination will be given to the accused's lawyer and then the statement of the accused will be recorded and a new decision will be given after hearing the parties' lawyers. famous lower court advocate from Jauharabad lawyer