Find a Lawyer

YASIR CHAUDHRY versus ZARAI TARAQIATI BANK LIMITED (ADBP) THROUGH BRANCH MANAGER

Appeals from Sections 9, 10 and 22, new application, application for leave to defend the case were banned after the bank loan collection was increased. The banking court filed 2004 and 2004 on behalf of the applicants to defend this claim. Instead of rejecting the application, the merit was decided and the same was dismissed, resulting in The case was ordered in favor of BankPlay. The lender was that no proper statement of accounts was put on record in support of the claimant by the bank. The creditors' request deserved to be dismissed on a brief basis that, over time, the banking court denied every aspect of the matter. It was concluded that the borrower failed to raise substantial questions about the law and the facts, which required recording of the evidence. In order to defend this case, submit a case for approval of leave and the banking court rightly dismissed his request that the litigation be brought before the Appellate / Revision Court for a completely new and different application. Cannot allow, whose request was not submitted in the lower forums. The leave petition was not mentioned in defense of the claim raised by the borrower, nor was the court below the banking court committing any legal error in passing the order, and the High Court did not issue Refused to reject the decision passed. Court appeals were dismissed in the circumstances property advocates from Renala Khurd lawyer