MIRZA ASHFAQ BEG versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
Sections 9, 16 and 18 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition Examination Control List Petitioner's naming was included in the NAB Reference, which results in overpayment for the purchase of ships, petitioner Was sentenced by the Accountability Court. But, on appeal, they were punished and acquitted. The National Accountability Bureau applied for leave to appeal in the Supreme Court, but there was no hearing which resulted in the petitioner. The passport was not issued on the request that his name was. The NAB placed the bureaucratic opposition on the Exit Control List, the only field to restrict the applicant's right to travel abroad, and said the opposition was due to the fact that the High Court decision Appeal for leave to appeal. After the Supreme Court's order of acquittal of the petitioner approved by the High Court, all motions have been applied. Even otherwise it was not possible to accept the argument that legal proceedings against the applicant were pending because, according to the High Court's decision, the leave of appeal would be considered final only when the leave of appeal was granted by the Supreme Court, The requesting authority was allowed to exclude the applicant's name from the Exit Control List \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Jacobabad lawyer