MESSRS SATTAR BROTHERS versus MESSRS HANIF JEE & SONS
Sections 2 (f) (G) (B), 15 (2) (II) and 21 Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), Section 54 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Homeowner Appellate Authority for Personal Needs The applicant / tenant sought to vacate the premises within the specified period under which the respondents asserted their right to own the premises in question on the basis of the contract of sale that Section 2 of the Sindh Rented Prices Ordinance 1979 ( B) The authenticity word landlord used in the premises was stated to be the owner of the premises and not the person who was then authorized to receive the rent of the premises, section 454 of the Transfer Property Act, 1882 Under the provisions of the sale, no right, title or interest in the property will be granted to the respondent, the respondent was not the owner of the premises and he may not claim the premises as per his personal requirement as he may be based on the contractual premises. The landlord could not claim the right, such land is not available to him, the order passed by the appellate authority was set aside by the High Court. In the constitutional petition, T
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Pindi gheb lawyer