Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus STATE

Sections 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 302 and 460 bail, further investigation grants took place in the darkness of the night and there was no evidence of murder and the names of the accused who committed the crime were initially unknown. ? The individuals did not file an FIR in any capacity, but more than a month after the alleged incident, their names appeared for the first time through a petition submitted by the victim's daughter, the victim's daughter said. The eyewitnesses never testified that evidence about the extra-judicial confession of the witness himself was provided to the Investigation Agency, which a prosecutor's witness stated in his statement more than four months ago. The testimony of the witnesses and the said testimony showed that the extra-judicial confession by the accused He was trapped in a confession that was unacceptable in evidence. If the alleged extra-judicial confession was considered a crime, there was compelling evidence of evidence remaining in the field after more than five months, in which a witness accused It was alleged that the witness was an abomination to the accused and further inquiry was sought at the apparent cost of the witness. , Which was placed in column number 2 of the challan, the Inquiry Agency recommended a discharge case against the accused, so that a further investigation into his crime could be sought, he was admitted on bail. immigration advocate from Chacklala lawyer