Find a Lawyer

BANK OF PUNJAB versus AMJAD LATIF RANA

Defendants obtained a loan of up to Rs. 2,50,000 from the bank to recover the debts of Sections 3, 9 and 22, which was payable in 72 equal monthly installments after the additional period of 3 months for the defendants to fulfill their obligation. I failed, the bank filed a lawsuit. 365,835 recovery of 53 rupees in which the bank claimed a markup of Rs 1,56,080 in which the banking court claimed that the order was canceled without a markup of Rs 156,080 and instead A markup of Rs 6503 was given, Waldetti Bank was entitled to this claim only if the parties executed the return agreement in terms of the letter of approval, on which the bank executed an agreement on behalf of the claimant. The import was neither relied upon nor presented to the trial court, the banking court did not properly approve the markup in the circumstances as the bank claimed. What is it. In the absence of any unlawful interference or weakness of the banking court's unwritten decision, the appeal was dismissed. famous high court advocate from Gawadar lawyer