AFTAB AHMED SAEED versus FAISAL SHAHZAD
Sections 2 (f) (j), 14 and 15 (2) (ii) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Tenant eviction based on default in payment of rent on land leased by landlord and tenant applicant. The executor was the sole proprietor of the premises in his favor and the respondent was the tenant in his own case, stating that according to section 2 of the "landlord" (0 granted under the Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979) Owner is appreciated. Make it clear that apart from the person who was authorized or entitled to the rent of the house, every co-owner of the premises was a landlord if one co-owner did not let the premises go out, but was entitled to some other rent. The co-owner or authorized person has left the property; by law, each co-owner of the property will be deemed to be the landlord and authorized to retain the eviction request on any land under section 14 or 15 of the Sindh Rated Premises Ordinance 1979. Without even joining the other C. O Owner as applicant, otherwise he had the ability to evict it, in the present case the applicant's question / property related to the property was based on registered lease deed and one of the claimants as tenant. The defendant's position was also not disputed, except that an adjournment between the applicant and his brother or the landlord of the landlord and other legal heirs of the original owner of the tenant would, in the circumstances, apply to the applicant and the respondents. Proved / proved under the joint decisions of the Rent Control and Appellate Authority, Default relating to the rent paid by him evacuation request
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Khanpur lawyer