Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HAROON versus THE STATE

Definitions of Sections 345 Preamble Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 310, 337 A (ii) (ii), 337 F (i) (ii), 504, 147 and 148 of the evidence assigned to the compromised counter-case against the accused had gone. The Additional Sessions Judge, while the accused was handed over to the Judicial Magistrate during the trial of the accused against the complaining party, the matter was settled with the complainant and the parties petitioned the Judicial Magistrate in the court. Submitted when permitted by the Judicial Magistrate. The matter came up for hearing before the Additional Sessions Judge, the complainants who had assured that they would request a settlement, the fact was not brought to the notice of the Additional Sessions Judge, which had rendered an invalid judgment under which The accused were convicted. In one case, the compromise will have an impact on the counter-case as well, and since two different courts are running, there are conflicting verdicts, trying both cases, one for trial and one for trial. It should have been submitted to the court itself, there was a good case for allowing the appeal in those circumstances, the unwanted decision was set aside and the case session judge was sent to DeNauv. In addition to the person making the case, the trial court, either by himself or the Additional Sessions Judge, will seek an agreement between the parties. immigration advocates email from Chilas lawyer