Find a Lawyer

MUBARIK ALI THROUGH L.RS. versus AMROO KHAN THROUGH L.RS

Articles 42 and 54 of the Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), 5 115 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) reaffirm the evidence of oral sale by the High Court in the exercise of the jurisdiction of the affirmation claim that the two Through the evidence, the trial court and the appellate court, believing the statements of the witnesses, said that the oral sale was between the parties, but the High Court, using the review jurisdiction, decided that the witnesses, in their proceedings. The source was the verbal sale of the suit house. Under Section 115, the CPC itself appreciated the evidence and formed an opinion against the plaintiffs so that no sale was made. The plaintiffs further argued that the High Court's jurisdiction was limited to the parameters of section 115 CPC and had no jurisdiction to intervene. Simply because of the fact that based on the material available on the record, in the second opinion it was possible to respect it. The plaintiff also claimed that the evidence of both witnesses agreed on the point that the plaintiff was entitled to a sale in favor of the plaintiff. Agreed to act, but his statements were denied because he did not submit the evidence as per the plaintiff's waiver appeal The Supreme Court approved the consideration of the plaintiffs' justification. \ n \ r \ n immigration advocate from Phoolnagar (Bhai Pheru) lawyer