Find a Lawyer

COLLECTOR, QUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE & SALES TAX, QUETTA versus MESSRS HAJI AHMEDULLAH & COMPANY, QUETTA AND ANOTHER

Article 32 and 181 Notice of Section R No. 374 (1) / 2002, dated 15 6 2002 The authority to pay fines and fraudulent penalties for customs duty wrongdoing by the customs authorities to collect the counterfeit and forfeiture goods Submitted that the authorities seized the goods and imposed a 300% penalty on the importer customs, excise and sales tax appellate tribunal and the appeal against the order of the appellate tribunal was dismissed by the High Court; , Who were responsible for counterfeiting and fraud in lieu of counterfeiting because they could have been released because of the confiscation Act is not in accordance with the provisions in Section 32 and 181 of 1969. It is a misrepresentation that is simple or false or false but on the contrary it was a case of tampering, fraud, forgery, duplication / counterfeiting. Related Documents No 1/2002, dated 15 6 2002, Supreme Court was not created. Set aside the Customs, Excise and Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal and High Court-approved decisions, and the order approved by the authorities was restored. top advocate from Sudhnoti lawyer