Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AYUB versus GHULAM MUHAMMAD

Section 42 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the plaintiff in the case of vacant property and homeless persons (repealed) Act (XIV of 1975), section 2 civil procedure code (v. 1908), section 9 Challenge transfer order passed in the case. The trial court did not reject the case because it was obtained by the Settlement Authority through the defendant through fraud and misrepresentation, but the plaintiff did not pass such order. Not challenged In the constitutional petition, the plaintiff challenged the transfer order, which was accepted by the High Court in the trial court for a new decision. Such disputes can be resolved by a civil court of legal jurisdiction after the settlement law has been settled. The plaintiff granted an exception to the transfer order, which was rejected by the High Court. The trial court had not acted unlawfully in seeking a trial. Supreme Court dismisses plea for transfer order and denies leave to appeal top advocates from Kamokey lawyer