Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD AYUB versus GHULAM MUHAMMAD


Section 42 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the plaintiff in the case of vacant property and homeless persons (repealed) Act (XIV of 1975), section 2 civil procedure code (v. 1908), section 9 Challenge transfer order passed in the case. The trial court did not reject the case because it was obtained by the Settlement Authority through the defendant through fraud and misrepresentation, but the plaintiff did not pass such order. Not challenged In the constitutional petition, the plaintiff challenged the transfer order, which was accepted by the High Court in the trial court for a new decision. Such disputes can be resolved by a civil court of legal jurisdiction after the settlement law has been settled. The plaintiff granted an exception to the transfer order, which was rejected by the High Court. The trial court had not acted unlawfully in seeking a trial. Supreme Court dismisses plea for transfer order and denies leave to appeal

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocate for immigration from Usta Mohammad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.