GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. THROUGH ADVOCATE-GENERAL, N.-W. F. P. versus MUHAMMAD IQBAL
Section 4, 11, 18, 23 and 54 Referring to Compensation Reimbursement The court filed a reference under section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act 1894, expressing dissatisfaction with the landlord's compensation rate of Rs. 25,000. It has called for a rate increase. The Marla Referee Court upheld both the owners and the acquiring authority, up to Rs 20,000 in each Marla compensation, satisfied with the determination of the rate of compensation, filed the first regular appeal against the referee's decision. In compliance with the High Court's remand order, the local commissioner, who had his opinion on the market value of the land, was upset by the local commissioner and prepared a report that was comprehensive and based on an invalid decision. That makes the decision unpleasant. And the decree was the result of misrepresentation and not reading the evidence that resulted in obvious injustice and could not be allowed to remain, the compensation was determined by the referee court, being fair and fair, Appeals filed by the parties were rejected.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
