IBRAHIM SHAMSI versus BASHIR AHMED MEMON
Section 10 shows a leave request to appeal to the court's record for the sale of assets of the company to the Official Assignee for direction of the company, when the second reference was made up to that time and the government official Was the highest bidder ever, and it was in 0 21 3 2005 or before the court on 4 2005, when the highest bid was still expected. New reference is ordered, 11 will be heard along with other references. 4 Before the aforesaid date of the 2005 hearing, objections were filed and the hearing was soon heard. 11 11 Instead of shortening the hearing period from 2005, the court decided to hear all pending citations, petitions and objections as 5-5 2005. Ordered Against its own determination, suddenly, the court began hearing an interim date, the third reference, in 2005, 2005, completely ignoring the second reference, which was again passed by the said order. Was. Despite the fact that it was left at the mercy of the official, it was already submitted for approval otherwise the court would certainly have given a second reference to the bidders whose basic principles Violating such an order was held that natural justice was not sustainable in law. The appeal for leave of appeal before the Supreme Court was converted into appeal by the Supreme Court, the appeal was accepted and the order of 184 2005 was set aside and the case was remanded with the judge's company remand. All references and requests, with all parties' objections and requests
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Shankiari lawyer