Find a Lawyer

ABDUL HAMEED versus MEMBER (REVENUE), BOARD OF REVENUE

R7A West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Sections 42 and 166 of Pakistan (1973), Arts 13 (A) and 212 (3) dismissal of civil servants who were the Deputy Tehsildars, Kongo and Patwari. The basis for allegations of corruption against civil servants was that - based on a previous order passed by a civil judge, they took action to approve the change of land in the possession of the Department of Public Works, and provincial government departments. Of Without the permission of the district collector, in favor of the prosecutors, and consequently, with unreasonable motives and unreasonable intentions, the appeal was granted by the Supreme Court to consider these questions through other questions. Whether the applicants were the ones who were subjected to two inquiry proceedings in which they were acquitted of the charges, the third time a de novo inquiry could be made without recording valid reasons. Can the applicant, who was sentenced to withhold two increments after a showcase notice not challenged by him, be prosecuted on the same allegations and violate Article 13 (a) of the Constitution? It can be punished greatly. Islamic Republic of Pakistan; were the applicants not obligated under Section 42 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1967, in accordance with the decision and order of the court which could not be entered into and the executive directive on admission and approval? Variations may result in removal of legal provisions. Whether the applicant against whom the allegations of corruption or misconduct were not proved and it has been admitted that top advocates from Chak Sawara lawyer