FAHAD versus STATE
The testimony of section 302 was to be satisfied not only by the court's sanction of the accused's conviction for murder, that the murder was committed, but also that it should be satisfied that the accused committed the murder. Before recording the sentence, the facts and circumstances of the case should be taken into account and the golden principles of criminal justice should also be kept in mind that in the case of murder, the office of evidence is always on the shoulders of the prosecution. And beyond any reasonable doubt it is necessary to stand trial against the accused. In the present case, the prosecution failed completely to establish the case against the accused but there was no evidence of any kind and the trial court failed to apply its judicial mind to the facts of the case in which the trial court proceeded. Was The trial, which was a violation of the principles of safe administration of criminal justice, the trial court overlooked in favor of the accused. At the end of the trial court, the prosecution failed in litigation and concluded the trial. had gone. The court contradicted the evidence on record in the circumstances and contradicted the rules set by the Superior Courts to allow the High Court of Appeals.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Mehar lawyer