GUL MUHAMMAD versus STATE
Applicants for Section 1414 & and 9439 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 380/497/411 forfeiture of the bailiffs' applicants, were dismissed by the trial court on absentee bail and despite numerous occasions Had failed to present, then, did not appear before the trial court itself and proceeded against the former Particular Trial Court, therefore, the applicant was justified in imposing a fine. The guarantor is not guaranteed on the basis of humanitarian sympathy, nor was he accused of the disappearance of the accused for any economic gain. The applicant must keep the balance between the balanced application of unbalanced and inappropriate intensity, keeping the fiscal position and it seems to be absent from the trial, the accused have caught him. The court imposed a fine of Rs 15,000 on the applicant in each case, reducing the interest of Justice Revi to Rs 5,000, according to which Sain's petitions were dealt with.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Naukot lawyer
