Find a Lawyer

RANA SHABBIR HUSSAIN versus STATE

Articles 392, 397, 342 and 506 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 103 Evidence was not held in this case Identity Parade was required to recover articles identifying the culprit as an example of the accused. Was. In violation of the provisions of section 103, the CRPC did not conduct any identification tests in relation to the recovered golden ear rings to determine if it was indeed a looted property. Investigating Officers confronted the eyewitnesses. Have been investigated before the investigation and the defense was denied the right to confront the investigating officers with contradictions in the testimony of the recovery witnesses, eyewitness testimony and recovery witness statements during the trial, and Their statements were filed under Section 161, CRPC, under section 342, CRPC. Subjects were not put before the accused, they could not be used. After being convicted under Section 392, the prosecution of the accused under Section 392 of the PPC, the PPC law was defective. And was not sustainable as his conviction for the commission of the same crime was doubled, while the accused was acquitted. online advocate from Fateh Pur lawyer