RANA NASIR ZAHEER versus STATE
Section 497 (2) Immigration Ordinance (XVIII of 1979), Sections 17 and 22 bail, further inquiries were filed with the FIR grant filed with the FIA, with a delay of almost three years, Maintained that he made some payments in connection with the sending of his son abroad to another person, and that the complainant had paid the accused in this case. Which was contrary to the position taken by the complainant in his application, arguably in his first position, by the other complainant. In his written statement filed by him in the Air Trial, in the written statement, the accused was not named in any of the qualifications and he maintained that it was the second person who sent the complainant to send his son abroad. Had received the full amount from. The case against the accused was also an inquiry into the circumstances that nothing was recovered from the possession of the accused during the investigation of the case. Continuing the custody of the accused in the finalized jail, it was not possible to present any beneficial motive case, further investigation of his offense against the accused under the provisions of sub-section (2) of Section Section 7, CR PC. Upon demand, he was admitted on bail \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Killa Saifullah lawyer