Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD MAALIK versus STATE

Sections 2?b (b) and 34 34 Definitions of evidence There was long-standing enmity between the parties. Those who were armed with firearms had been acquitted by the trial court, even for the purpose of the FIR that the murder case was prosecuted between the complainant and the accused. The accused culprit was also acquitted and his co-accused was not attributed to the accused other than his co-accused where there was enmity. On the same evidence, the accused was acquitted from the trial court case against the suspected suspect, he was sentenced and sentenced, which gave him the benefit of the doubt. had gone. famous high court advocate from Jampur lawyer