Find a Lawyer

NOOR MUHAMMAD versus STATE

Sections 514, 435 and 439 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 337 F (v), 337 A (i) and 34 bail bail were granted before the arrest of the accused in the case and the applicants filed their bail. Had set a hearing date on bail. , The accused appeared in court on the first call, but the court did not wait for the closing hours even though the accused's bail applications were dismissed for non-prosecution and the applicants / bail bail bail was granted and the section was dismissed. Showcases notices were displayed under 514, the CC Petition was issued to the applicants, to which they responded promptly. It was submitted to the applicants that their responsibility was only until the bail application was argued, it was not well established as the bailout was liable, till the settlement of the bail application. The accused was to be brought to the court whenever the case was called. It was to secure the presence of the accused in the court that the bail bonds were obtained from the accused. The responsibility of the applicants / bailiffs was to ensure that the accused was present in the court when the case was re-summoned, before the trial court directed that each be paid Rs. 25,000. Pay Rs 10,000 instead pakistani advocates Yazman Mandi lawyer