FAYYAZ AHMAD versus STATE
Definitions of Articles 392 and 411 Evidence Defective The defendant did not challenge his sentence, but prayed for the reduction of sentence, the complainant himself took the oath before the appellate court apologized. Sentenced one year out of three years. The prosecution's case was established solely through an ocular account and with the help of a recovery memo with the assistance of the investigating officer, the defendant was justified in not challenging his conviction that the defendants during the trial. Was compromised and the accused had no prior criminal history, the accused's sentence had already passed and he was released.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Tobatek Singh lawyer