Find a Lawyer

PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT versus MUHAMMAD KHAN

Section 45 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Declaration of Change in Section 42, Proof of Property Under several facts, courts filed suit claiming to be owners of disputed school land, defendants claimed by authorities. Denied. To prove this ownership, the plaintiffs relied on the registered sale deed and the land variable The trial court ruled the trial to the extent of the land listed in the sale deed, and the remaining land was not part and parcel of the school's decision. Was announced. The order passed by the trial court was upheld by the appellate court plaintiffs, relying on the entries in the Revenue Record relating to the ownership of the school land, my accuracy did not create any right, nor did the existing right. Except that the same was approved on the basis of matters / facts, if denied, independently proving that there existed the plaintiffs' authorities failed to make them. There is no evidence in the record. To show that the plaintiffs' rights were negotiated in the land, sufficient evidence was given to both the courts Their decisions were in accordance with the law, with plaintiffs failing to identify any evidence that neither of them had read. Under the jurisdiction of the review, the courts below the High Court refused to interfere with the conclusions of the court's facts, which were given after the proper definition of the evidence on the record, in which circumstances the review was dismissed. property advocate from Tarnol lawyer