Find a Lawyer

MST. FARZANA PARVEEN versus KARACHI ELECTRIC SUPPLY CORPORATION

Section 1 Electricity Rules, 1973, R76 The plaintiff's widow for recovering a fatal accident damages was the widow of the victim filed a lawsuit against the Electric Corporation for damages because her husband was in danger. Came in contact with electrical wires. Cardiovascular failure was the cause of the death of Mutofi by a Mateo Legal Officer on the road, resulting in an electric shock that was claimed by the plaintiff in which Mutofi died and the Electric Corporation has proven that such an incident. Didn't work. Electric Corporation has been completely negligent in performing public duties. Under the law, the corporation is responsible for proper maintenance and maintenance of the net work of overhead wires, cables, poles and other electrical installations related to energy transmission and distribution. Citizens have a heavy responsibility for the death of C. The Corporation did not provide guard wires at the scene of the incident to maintain and maintain its installations and other related matters in a highly organized manner through timely and timely checking. In the absence of a supply of protective wires by the corporation. It was completely negligence to comply with the law and violate R 76 of the Electricity Rules 1973, under the concept of strict liability, the plaintiff only needed to confirm That the corporation was caused by the plaintiff's effective or dangerous activity. To prove by means of solid evidence that the negligence of the corporation has occurred and the plaintiff's and the plaintiff's legal legacies in their view of the strict liability. list of advocates from Chunian lawyer