Find a Lawyer

MIAN GUL THROUGH L.RS. versus SAMAR GUL

Section 42 Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), sections 115 and O XXXIX, Rr 1 and 2 interim injunction, on the basis of an order passed by the existing courts of fact, approved by the civil court pre-emption suit. Approval of facts from. It was decided by the defendant on the basis of the agreement that the petition filed by the defendant was dismissed on the basis of illegal prosecution but it applied for relief rather than reinstatement. Had filed a petition with the Revenue Authorities. By the Appellate Authority along with the Revenue Officer but the Board of Revenue accepting the review, the Revenue Officer as well as the Appellate Authority clarified that the orders passed by the Board of Revenue were set aside and the interim order Called for a restraint. Against an order passed by the Board of Revenue Accuracy, it was the duty and duty of Revenue to approve the mutation based on the order, therefore, the Revenue Authority made a mistake in the law that the respondent's request for The mutation should not be approved in favor. Both the courts below refused to take arbitrary action in favor of the accused, which was in accordance with the law. In the Shahzada Mohammad Omar Baig case submitted by the Supreme Court, it is reported that the PLD 1970 SC 139 High Court refused to interfere with the orders under the courts and instructed the trial court to refrain from this observation. Decide the case without being affected. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Hub Inds Estate lawyer