AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN THROUGH BRANCH MANAGER versus SHAH JEHAN
Section 9 and 22 suit for debt collection has been decided to include the markup claim filed by the bank through markup from the date of the institution suit to the collection of the data, the expiry of the contract. Subsequently, the bank's complaint that the markup amount claimed by the bank, the institutional suit, was excluded was that the markup should have been included because there was a condition in the agreement between the parties for the payment of the markup bank, However, they did not show the time after which the respondents were obliged to pay markup. The expiration of the contract could not be allowed without any special conditions in the agreement. In the absence of any error in the judgment of the court, the appeal against the judgment was dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Babri Banda lawyer