Find a Lawyer

ABDUL AZIZ versus LAL KHAN

Paragraph 25 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Articles 42 and 44 of the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Sections 42 and 54 of the Amendment suit and the permanent injunction prohibiting the plaintiff from making two changes in relation to the land. They were charged with fraud and were bound to be rejected without violating the Law Reforms Rule 1972, the lawsuit filed by the plaintiff from time to time was decided by the courts. The two courts were not justified in recording the conclusions that the dispute was variable. Violations of the Land Reform Regulations 1972 were affirmed. First, because the Additional Commissioner and then the Board of Revenue, having special powers under the rules, justified the validity of these mutations as valid and correctly approved, if not within the scope. If there is a deficiency or desire, the plaintiff can challenge the same. The High Court, not by a civil suit, by constitutional application, because the jurisdiction of the Civil Court in such cases was expressly excluded. Secondly, the powers created under the Land Reform Regulations 1972 had special jurisdiction to see their accuracy or to change it, if the two courts below believed that as a violation of the rules. If two mutations have been confirmed, they can make the same reference under the Land Commissioner. The civil court may not exercise such powers under any law, and in case of mutation is illegal the violation of the two court rules immigration advocates phone number from Khuzdar lawyer