MUHAMMAD KHALIQUE KHAN versus GENERAL MANAGER, SOUTHERN TELECOM REGION-I, HYDERABAD
Sections 3, 4 (1) (b) (ii), 5, 6 and 7 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Compulsory Retirement Appeal Release and notice after issuance of charge sheet Was banned. Allegations of theft, misappropriation / embezzlement, etc., but without regular inquiry against him, without giving him a chance to cross-examine witnesses against him and to give him a chance to record his defense, if any. Is not equivalent to a regular inquiry as many serious allegations of fact have been leveled against the appellant, so regular inquiry was deemed necessary and a mandatory retirement order to examine the evidence presented against him and his defense. Should have provided the full opportunity for approval. Against the appellant, the matter was set aside and the matter was remanded to allow appropriate and regular inquiry against the appellant within the specified period. The law gives him ample opportunity to examine witnesses and to direct evidence. \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
