ABDUL ZAHOOR QURESHI versus KARACHI ELECTRIC SUPPLY CORPORATION LTD.
Section 3, 11 and 12 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 2A & 4 Service Appellants to serve with a charge sheet for illegally obtaining satisfaction, without ordering a regular inquiry against them. After he was removed from the job. In connection with the bribe money, did not appear in the presence and presence of the prosecution witness, documents indicate, the alleged confessional statement of the prosecution was obtained by force and pressure by the Army Intelligence Wing, it was That the dismissal / removal order was not granted to the appellant, he was given no opportunity of a personal hearing; under the circumstances Audi Ultram was ruled by PARTIUM (could not be heard) by any witness. The appellant did not face an alleged confessional statement during. The appellant was examined in the presence of the appellant and the appellant was also deprived of his right to cross-examine the witness. The whole matter was silent on the currency note about the alleged bribe and every one of them There was no record and benefit to all aspects of the nomination of one; the complainant did not file any written complaint against the appellant's copy. The appellant's so-called confession showed that there was no evidence of the amount sought in the appellant's alleged statement. Payment of money, for the purpose for which the money was given and the receipt of said amount, if for any reason the notice alleges that Rs 2500 as bribe was received by the appellant, by all facts it is Appears to have wrongfully removed the appellant. / Appellant
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
