Find a Lawyer

QAISER AHMED SHEIKH versus MUHAMMAD TAHIR SHAH

Sections 52, 55 55, 70, Code, & 81 and Civil 83 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 139 Oaths Act (X of 1873), Section 7 Elections challenging the election of retired candidate in the petition Selection was requested in the petition The petitioner's request from the unsuccessful candidate was that illegal practices were committed before the election, at the time of demarcation, establishment of polling stations, appointment of polling staff, polling campaign itself. During and after the polling written statement, the receiving candidate revealed that non-compliance with the provisions of section 55 (3) of the Public Representation Act 1976 Services were raised several preliminary objections against the electoral application and that the applicant was accused by his election affidavit filed with the application are not fulfilled. The requirement of the law; the affidavit of verification of election request was not certified according to the directions and rules of the High Court and the extreme schedule or affiliation filed on the election application record was not certified by the applicant during the hearing during the hearing or hearing. The oath was intended to confront the maker and to make sure that the declaration was factual and that it should be presented to a person who had not appeared before the authentic petitioner and the Oath Commissioner. Nor was the certificate presented on how the Oath Commissioner identified the affidavit. Pune did you satisfied. The election petition and its affidavit were not complied with the mandatory provisions of section 55 (3) of the Public Representation Act, 1976, which were not complied with, best law firm from Mari Indus lawyer