Find a Lawyer

NAZAR HUSSAIN versus STATE

The definition of Section 9 (c) Evidence Inspector / Section HA, which was the complainant of the case and it also drafted all the important investigative documents under which the alleged drug was recovered from each accused, the prosecution. Also did not investigate the case. Since the restitution notes were not substantiated on the file, which is evidence of another police officer who narrated the prosecutor's story or mere confirmation of his recovery notes is not sufficient to establish a prosecution case. That was later investigated. In this case and under section 161, the statements of all the witnesses of the prosecution have been recorded, CRPC was not presented to confirm that the allegations against the accused were true, even None of the witnesses present in the court had stated that under it, under section 1773, CCP was prepared for the preparation of the crucial IP against the accused in the case of prosecution of witnesses for rape. A major controversy was left, with charges of similar nature as CC accused, the trial court already acquitted under section 6565K, CRPC And the same evidence cannot be ascertained against the accused. Without any free cooperation which was not present in the case, the conviction of the accused was based on mere assumption that the evidence of the entire prosecution was not only suspicious but extremely flawed and the case was not established against the accused in any way. Was acquitted. power of attorney advocate Kamokey lawyer