Find a Lawyer

ARBAB CONTRACTING & CO. THROUGH MANAGING PARTNER versus TEHSIL MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, MULTAN

Section 54 Punjab Local Government (Auction of Recovery Rights) Rules, 2003, R5 (V), 9, 16 and 17 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 constitutional petition justifies publication of various works auction program. The reserve price was not mentioned in the public notice published in the newspaper in connection with the auction program. The reserve price was not calculated on the basis of the criteria set out in the Punjab Local Government (Collection Rights Auction) Rules 2003, KR 9. According to the reserve price, the deposit was not collected and that all the conditions were not complied with. The publication revealed that it did not specify any reserve price, an example of which must be stated in the public notice. The reserve pricing mechanism was also provided by the Punjab Local Government auction through the Collection Rights Regulations 2003, 2003 and the arrears as per R16 of the said rules were to be calculated on the basis of this default value. And was It should be mentioned in the post that the basis for reserve pricing was not available on record, so the entire auction process was done without that basis, there was no legal result for the person who was awarded the contract. Which was not eligible under section 54 (?). ) Permits a constitutional application to have a contract of any of the works of the Local Council under the Local Government Ordinance 2001, the High Court published in the T newspaper was an illegal publication and consequently auctioned and the person The given agreement was also illegal family advocate from Nilore lawyer