MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, FAISALABAD
Section 12 (2) and O. VIII, R11 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 181 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition Application for separation of order based on fraud and misrepresentation to the disputed property. Previously allocated to the applicant, whose allotment remained in the Supreme Court suit by S in the case of disputed property, he was charged with selling it by T without the applicant's application. On the basis of confessional statement of the applicants having knowledge of T applicants on 4 1998 11 1998, the decree of consent was passed on 4-6 1996. Regarding the filing of an application under section 12 (2), application number 2 22 2001 under CPC, the application under OVII, R 11, CPC on the order of hearing on August 22, 2001 The request for a restriction was requested by the trial court and the reviewing court because of the rejection and Article 181 of the Act 1908 was not denied by T&S on any such request. Without the source being the party, the time limit for filing such an application will be governed by the lawsuit, and not by the date of the decree, but by law and fact. Due to the question of Lot, the decision cannot be made which will not give the parties the opportunity to present their evidence, which resulted in the High Court accepting the constitutional petition and after the recording of the evidence formulation. Illegal with the trial court's direction to decide such a request
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
