SYED TARIQ ALI THROUGH GENERAL-ATTORNEY versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, RAWALPINDI
Article 5 and the Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for recovery of the amount of Dover, three cases of dowry articles and maintenance were upheld by the Family Court and stable cases were settled, the defendants testified. Cases were set for international inspection, but defendants' attorneys failed to appear, pre-trial proceedings against defendants were initiated and the case adjourned for prior arguments. The petition for the pretrial hearing filed by the defendants was dismissed and the family court heard the previous arguments and adjudicated after hearing all three cases. A partial decision / order was filed by the appellate court against the decision and decision of the Family Court by the defendant, the defendants filed a constitutional petition. The Family Court's appropriate interim order disclosed that the defendants were given five opportunities to examine the plaintiff's witnesses, but on each occasion, the necessary work was not performed to pay Asian costs. Was subjected to, but there was no submission from the defendants, after which the Family Court had no other option, except for some reason for the absence of the defendant or anyone. Will be absent. Otherwise, the earlier proceedings could not be set aside for the plaintiffs to present their evidence in support of their claim in the investigations and they agreed with the plaintiff's allowance, the outstanding Dover amount and both family members with the defendant's family. Had proved his right to the articles of Court and up
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Jamshoro lawyer