Find a Lawyer

AAMER MUSHTAQ DAR versus WAPDA THROUGH CHAIRMAN, LAHORE

A VII, R 2 and O XXVII, R 8 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application to recover damages amount in a private capacity suit to the plaintiff by the plaintiff through its chairman to the other defendants. Was filed with. The Authority of the Authority said in a trial in his private capacity that other defendants have filed an application under OXXVII, R 8, CPC, claiming that they performed their official duties and that Should not be considered as a party to their personal competence and should not be prosecuted in private capacity. The defendants' plea was accepted by the trial court and the appellate court also reviewed and the plaintiff filed a constitutional petition against the court's orders, linking it to the other accused and linking it to official duties. Was decided by the competent authority. His competence in the public capacity and defendant's authority would be responsible for its outcome. The defendant's authority was ready and he raised the bar to confront the issue and accept responsibility from his employees / other defendants. It was raised that, in the case of an injunction, the rights of the claimant are granted in its favor, in the event of its being fully protected. In the constitutional jurisdiction the relief provided by the High Court was at its discretion and the High Court having to exercise or deny its constitutional jurisdiction must take into account all aspects of the matter and it cannot be ignored. The mutual order passed on an interlocutory order best advocate from Morgah lawyer