GOHRAM KHAN versus DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS POLICE, C.P.O. LAHORE
Section 3, 5 and 6 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), after issuing a notice from the job after serving the appellant as a constable to the section 4 service, issued the notice on the charges of the last eight different convictions. Was reported, which is highly corrupt. Against a bad reputation, the appellant was prosecuted without regular inquiry. Major penalties for dismissal from employment without regular inquiry into alleged serious misconduct of work misconduct were not justified, effective order of removal of appellant was fixed, appellant's service remanded in appellant's service. Also, it was not made profitable for any place for which he was removed from the job, for which the appellant would file an affidavit before the competent authority, however, he could be questioned. Is. Strictly the appellant r \ n \ r \ n within the special period
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Lasbela lawyer